Active battles around the tax on the withdrawn capital are continuing for more than a year. However, no new “pros and cons” appeared.
The dilemma is whether the budget will actually suffer serious losses during the first and second years. No one wants to take such responsibility, even people who understand the positive effect of this decision on the economy. On the other hand, this position – “at least to meet the budget” – is the key problem of the lack of reforms.
It is necessary to understand that “meeting the budget” and ensuring “economic growth” – are two different things.
Viktor Andrusov, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future
Вам також буде цікаво:
FORGIVENESS FOR THE WANDERING MONEY: TAX AMNESTY OF ZE TEAM
The government of Ukraine presented a delightful plan (ru)
Delegation of UIF in Washington has witnessed new sanctions against Russia (photo, video)
HOW THE EXODUS OF LABOR MIGRANTS FROM UKRAINE WILL AFFECT THE ELECTIONS IN 2019
Old challenges for the renewed Constitutional Court
RUSSIA, CYPRUS, THE NETHERLANDS: THE EXPERT EXPLAINED WHY RUSSIA IS THE MAIN INVESTOR FOR THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY