The adoption of this bill, I wrote about it earlier, is the main and very important step for a successful discussion of all future scenarios. For the Minsk format (together with possible peacekeepers), the Law fixes the priority of security points, without their numbers, what is logical, since part of the important steps for Ukraine (the same border) in the text of Minsk-2 are postponed for an indefinite period “after the elections”. In this case there is a law – first of all security, and then everything else. And the Ukrainian side can already calmly and reasonably say that it cannot violate its own legislation for the sake of another compromise. And to change the law, there are needed some steps further from the other side.

Вам також буде цікаво:
German “shutdown”: Why can’t Angela Merkel agree on a coalition and what are the consequences of this for Ukraine?
HOW THE FRENCH WILL BUILD OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE UKRAINIANS WILL DO THE SAME IN INDIA
Is there an alternative to the IMF lending?
TO CATCH UP AND OUTDO AMERICA: WHY RUSSIA GOES BACK TO AFGHANISTAN AGAIN
Pavlo Shchelin: Reformation period 2.0 is possible in Russia
VICTORY OF AD HOC LIBERALS IN SLOVAKIA – A CHANCE FOR EUROPEAN FORCES