– The given decision was predictable, and the majority of borrowers from 2014 ceased to serve loans. Ukrainian banks have long ago created reserves for these loans, which affected their financial indices in years 2014-2015. Moreover, many borrowers, legal entities, have changed their registration into Russian. It is extremely difficult to collect these loans in the legal field. Taking into account this decision, I think it would be right to make a claim not to the borrowers, not to the Crimean council, but to the Russian Federation, with demand to compensate the caused damages. The question is: who will make demands?
It would be logical for the Ukrainian banks to make claims, but only when Ukraine officially pushes its demands to the Russian Federation in the court for compensation of the caused damages, – Anatoliy Amelin commented.
Вам також буде цікаво:
THE ROMANIAN ECONOMY GROWS, THE COUNTRY COUNTS ON THE LABOUR IMMIGRANTS – THE NEWS DIGEST
TRUMP AND THE TOOLBOX OF SANCTIONS: HOW TO DEAL WITH IT?
NOW MIGRANT WORKERS ARE IN FACT SAVING THE ECONOMY OF UKRAINE – AMELIN
Deportation of Saakashvili: any decision spoils execution
WHAT DOES THE CANCELLATION OF THE CONTRACT ON LIQUIDATION OF ROCKETS OF AVERAGE AND SMALL RANGE BETWEEN THE US AND RUSSIA MEAN?
Vladimir Shulmeister: We are even more important to Ryanair than it is to us (video)