– The given decision was predictable, and the majority of borrowers from 2014 ceased to serve loans. Ukrainian banks have long ago created reserves for these loans, which affected their financial indices in years 2014-2015. Moreover, many borrowers, legal entities, have changed their registration into Russian. It is extremely difficult to collect these loans in the legal field. Taking into account this decision, I think it would be right to make a claim not to the borrowers, not to the Crimean council, but to the Russian Federation, with demand to compensate the caused damages. The question is: who will make demands?
It would be logical for the Ukrainian banks to make claims, but only when Ukraine officially pushes its demands to the Russian Federation in the court for compensation of the caused damages, – Anatoliy Amelin commented.
Вам також буде цікаво:
THE VISION OF THE UKRAINIAN UNIVERSITY IN 2030
INVESTIGATION IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE DISCIPLINARY STANDARDS OF NATO
Nadiya Koval goes from the UIF to the Diplomatic Academy under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Igar Tyshkevich about scandal with Saakashvili: The West is already reacting
What does Fatou Bensouda know about the war in the Donbas?
Art in high school: more than drawing (ua)