FOTO: strana.ua
Active battles around the tax on the withdrawn capital are continuing for more than a year. However, no new “pros and cons” appeared.
The dilemma is whether the budget will actually suffer serious losses during the first and second years. No one wants to take such responsibility, even people who understand the positive effect of this decision on the economy. On the other hand, this position – “at least to meet the budget” – is the key problem of the lack of reforms.
It is necessary to understand that “meeting the budget” and ensuring “economic growth” – are two different things.
Viktor Andrusov, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future
Вам також буде цікаво:
State Duma. Version 7.0. Russian parliamentarism after Crimea. FOREWORD
IRAQ HAS ELECTED PRESIDENT, IRAN WON, USA LOST
Why the nationalization is the best thing that could happen to Privatbank?
THE WORLD MEDIA ARE RACING ONE ANOTHER TO WRITE ABOUT CARLOS GHOSN`S RESIGNATION: WHO IS THIS GUY?
Volodymyr Shulmeyster at first commented on his appointment as Adviser in Mykolaiv Regional State Administration
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE: WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH RENAMING