FOTO: strana.ua
Active battles around the tax on the withdrawn capital are continuing for more than a year. However, no new “pros and cons” appeared.
The dilemma is whether the budget will actually suffer serious losses during the first and second years. No one wants to take such responsibility, even people who understand the positive effect of this decision on the economy. On the other hand, this position – “at least to meet the budget” – is the key problem of the lack of reforms.
It is necessary to understand that “meeting the budget” and ensuring “economic growth” – are two different things.
Viktor Andrusov, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future
Вам також буде цікаво:
YURIY GOLYK HAS HEADED THE PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” AT THE UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE
ANTIBRITTLENESS: IGOR LISKI FROM “EFFECTIVE INVESTMENTS” ON HOW TO BUILD A STABLE BUSINESS IN AN UNSTABLE COUNTRY
For what sum did agrarians replenish the budget of Ukraine
What to expect of Ukrainian education in 2018?
HUNGARY WILL CONTINUE TO BLOCK UKRAINE’S PATH TO NATO
“Ukrainian Institute for the Future” invites experts to cooperate in economy and infrastructure (uk)