Reputation is above all. While passing the selection rounds, the candidates defended the most valuable thing for lawyers – their own reputation. This was done in various ways. Someone confessed on his Facebook page, someone wanted to hear at a meeting of the Integrity Council, some chose a more reactive way of judicial appeal. Everything to achieve a single result – getting into the top list of 120 winners. There was also the fact that the WCRC disagreed with the conclusion of the Public Integrity Council, or the Council itself cancelled the conclusion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7cf8/b7cf8589a4b4ece6890ec2163c78037f1c3830c8" alt=""
Вам також буде цікаво:
WE ALL SEEK WHAT IS BETTER: THE ECONOMIC ASPECT OF EVENTS IN PACE
Brexit as a Rhetorical Exercise: How does Britain’s Leaving the EU Proceed So Far
Trump fees and Merkel’s new government: forecast of international UIF expert on March 12-18
WHAT’S WRONG WITH YULIA TYMOSHENKO`S GAS CHARITY?
Brexit: the opinion of the UK Supreme Court (uk)
Joy of learning vs curriculum: how modern parents find a balance in education